An official website of the United States government. 
News Release 15-042
Inv. No(s). 701-TA-514 and 731-TA-1250 (Final)
Contact: Peg O'Laughlin, 202-205-1819
The United States International Trade Commission (USITC) today determined that the establishment of a U.S. industry is not materially retarded by reason of imports of 53-foot domestic dry containers from China that the U.S. Department of Commerce has determined are subsidized and sold in the United States at less than fair value.
Chairman Meredith M. Broadbent, Vice Chairman Dean A. Pinkert, and Commissioners Irving A. Williamson, David S. Johanson, and Rhonda K. Schmidtlein voted in the negative. Commissioner F. Scott Kieff did not participate in the final phase of these investigations.
As a result of the USITC’s negative determinations, no antidumping or countervailing duty orders will be issued on imports of these products from China.
The Commission’s public report 53-Foot Domestic Dry Containers from China (Investigation Nos. 701-TA-514 and 731-TA-1250 (Final), USITC Publication 4537, June 2015) will contain the views of the Commissioners and information developed during the investigations.
The report will be available by June 22, 2015; when available, it may be accessed on the USITC website at: http://pubapps.usitc.gov/applications/publogs/qry_publication_loglist.asp.
UNITED STATES INTERNATIONAL TRADE COMMISSION
Office of Industries
Washington, DC 20436
FACTUAL HIGHLIGHTS
53-Foot Domestic Dry Containers from China
Investigation Nos. 701-TA-514 and 731-TA-1250 (Final)
Product Description: The product subject to investigation includes closed van containers exceeding 48 feet, but generally measuring 53 feet in length, which are designed to transport dry goods primarily by rail or by road vehicles, or by a combination of both modes, largely within North America. Domestic containers are closed on all sides, including the top, and accessed through lockable double doors at one end. Domestic containers are “dry” because they are not designed or intended for carrying liquids or goods requiring refrigeration. In addition, domestic containers have various handlings and fittings so that the containers can be lifted and then mounted on various platforms, such as a chassis, a railroad well car, or a ship, for movement.
Status of Proceedings:
1. Type of investigations: Final antidumping and countervailing duty.
2. Petitioner: Stoughton Trailers, LLC.
3. Investigation instituted by USITC: April 23, 2014.
4. USITC hearing: April 16, 2015.
5. USITC vote: May 19, 2015.
6. USITC notification of Department of Commerce: June 1, 2015.
U.S. Industry:
1. Number of U.S. producers in 2014: 2.
2. Location of producers’ plants: Wisconsin and Alabama.
3. Employment of production and related workers in 2014: [1]
4. U.S. producers’ U.S. shipments in 2014: 1
5. Apparent U.S. consumption in 2014: 1
6. Ratio of subject imports to apparent U.S. consumption in 2014: 1
U.S. Imports in 2014:
1. From the subject countries during 2014: 1
2. From other countries during 2014: 1
3. Leading sources during 2014: China.
[1] Withheld to avoid disclosure of business proprietary information.
News Release 15-029
Inv. No(s). 731-TA-1269 (Preliminary)
Contact: Peg O'Laughlin, 202-205-1819
The United States International Trade Commission (USITC) today determined that there is a reasonable indication that a U.S. industry is materially injured by reason of imports of silicomanganese from Australia that are allegedly sold in the United States at less than fair value.
All six Commissioners voted in the affirmative.
As a result of the Commission’s affirmative determination, the U.S. Department of Commerce will continue to conduct its investigation on imports of this product from Australia, with its preliminary antidumping duty determination due on or about July 29, 2015.
The Commission’s public report Silicomanganese from Australia (Investigation No. 731-TA-1269 (Preliminary), USITC Publication 4528, April 2015) will contain the views of the Commission and information developed during the investigations.
The report will be available after May 4, 2015. After that date, it may be accessed on the USITC website at: http://pubapps.usitc.gov/applications/publogs/qry_publication_loglist.asp.
UNITED STATES INTERNATIONAL TRADE COMMISSION
Office of Industries
Washington, DC 20436
FACTUAL HIGHLIGHTS
Silicomanganese from Australia
Investigation No. 731-TA-1269 (Preliminary)
Product Description: The scope of this investigation covers all forms, sizes and compositions of silicomanganese, except low‐carbon silicomanganese, including silicomanganese briquettes, fines, and slag. Silicomanganese is a ferroalloy composed principally of manganese, silicon, and iron, and normally contains much smaller proportions of minor elements, such as carbon, phosphorus, and sulfur. Silicomanganese is sometimes referred to as ferrosilicon manganese.
The low‐carbon silicomanganese excluded from this investigation is a ferroalloy with the following chemical specifications by weight: minimum 55 percent manganese, minimum 27 percent silicon, minimum 4 percent iron, maximum 0.10 percent phosphorus, maximum 0.10 percent carbon, and maximum 0.05 percent sulfur. Low‐carbon silicomanganese is sometimes referred to as ferromanganese‐silicon.
Status of Proceeding:
1. Type of investigation: Preliminary antidumping.
2. Petitioner: Felman Production LLC, Letart, West Virginia.
3. Preliminary investigation instituted by the USITC: February 19, 2015.
4. Commission’s conference: March 12, 2015.
5. USITC vote: April 3, 2015.
6. USITC determinations to the U.S. Department of Commerce: April 6, 2015.
7. USITC views to the U.S. Department of Commerce: April 13, 2015.
U.S. Industry:
1. Number of producers in 2014: Two.
2. Location of producers’ plants: Ohio and West Virginia.
3. Employment of production and related workers in 2014: [1]
4. Apparent U.S. consumption in 2014: 1
5. Ratio of the value of total U.S. imports to total U.S. consumption in 2014: 1
U.S. Imports:
1. From the subject country during 2014: $78.6 million.
2. From other countries during 2014: $368.8 million.
3. Leading sources during 2014: Georgia, South Africa and Australia (in terms of total value).
[1] Withheld to avoid disclosure of business proprietary information.
News Release 15-028
Inv. No(s). 701-TA-432 and 731-TA-1024-1028 (Second Review) and AA1921-188 (Fourth Review)
Contact: Peg O'Laughlin, 202-205-1819
The U.S. International Trade Commission (USITC) today determined that revoking the existing antidumping and countervailing duty orders on prestressed concrete steel wire strand from Brazil, India, Japan, Korea, Mexico, and Thailand would be likely to lead to continuation or recurrence of material injury within a reasonably foreseeable time.
As a result of the Commission’s affirmative determinations, the existing orders on imports of this product from Brazil, India, Japan, Korea, Mexico, and Thailand will remain in place.
All six Commissioners voted in the affirmative.
Today’s action comes under the five-year (sunset) review process required by the Uruguay Round Agreements Act. See the attached page for background on these five-year (sunset) reviews.
The Commission’s public report Prestressed Concrete Steel Wire Strand from Brazil, India, Japan, Korea, Mexico, and Thailand (Inv. Nos. 701-TA-432 and 731-TA-1024-1028 (Second Review) and AA1921-188 (Fourth Review), USITC Publication 4527, April 2015) will contain the views of the Commission and information developed during the reviews.
The report will be available after May 1, 2015. After that date, it may be accessed on the USITC website at: http://pubapps.usitc.gov/applications/publogs/qry_publication_loglist.asp.
BACKGROUND
The Uruguay Round Agreements Act requires the Department of Commerce to revoke an antidumping or countervailing duty order, or terminate a suspension agreement, after five years unless the Department of Commerce and the USITC determine that revoking the order or terminating the suspension agreement would be likely to lead to continuation or recurrence of dumping or subsidies (Commerce) and of material injury (USITC) within a reasonably foreseeable time.
The Commission’s institution notice in five-year reviews requests that interested parties file responses with the Commission concerning the likely effects of revoking the order under review as well as other information. Generally within 95 days from institution, the Commission will determine whether the responses it has received reflect an adequate or inadequate level of interest in a full review. If responses to the USITC’s notice of institution are adequate, or if other circumstances warrant a full review, the Commission conducts a full review, which includes a public hearing and issuance of questionnaires.
The Commission generally does not hold a hearing or conduct further investigative activities in expedited reviews. Commissioners base their injury determination in expedited reviews on the facts available, including the Commission’s prior injury and review determinations, responses received to its notice of institution, data collected by staff in connection with the review, and information provided by the Department of Commerce.
The five-year (sunset) reviews concerning Prestressed Concrete Steel Wire Strand from Brazil, India, Japan, Korea, Mexico, and Thailand were instituted on November 3, 2014.
On February 6, 2015, the Commission voted to conduct an expedited review. All six Commissioners concluded that the domestic group response for these reviews was adequate and the respondent group responses were inadequate and voted for expedited reviews.
A record of the Commission’s vote to conduct expedited reviews is available from the Office of the Secretary, U.S. International Trade Commission, 500 E Street SW, Washington, DC 20436. Requests may be made by telephone by calling 202-205-1802.
News Release 15-023
Inv. No(s). 704-TA-1 and 734-TA-1
Contact: Peg O'Laughlin, 202-205-1819
The U.S. International Trade Commission (USITC) today determined that the injurious effect of imports of sugar from Mexico on the domestic industry as a whole is eliminated by suspension agreements agreed to by the U.S. Department of Commerce (Commerce) and the government of Mexico and Mexican exporters of sugar.
Consistent with the Commission’s practice, Commissioners will explain in their forthcoming opinion their views with respect to the arguments made by the domestic industry, including the petitioning U.S. refiners, and the other interested parties regarding the impact of those agreements.
As a result of the Commission’s affirmative determinations that the injurious effect of imports of sugar from Mexico is eliminated by the Commerce suspension agreements, the suspension agreements will remain in effect.
All six Commissioners voted in the affirmative.
The Commission’s determinations result from reviews conducted under sections 704(h) and 734(h) of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended, 19 U.S.C. §§ 1671c(h) and 1673c(h), as a result of petitions filed on January 8, 2015, by Imperial Sugar Company (Imperial), Sugarland, TX, and AmCane Sugar LLC (AmCane), Taylor, MI. These are the first reviews that the Commission has conducted under sections 704(h) and 734(h). Under these provisions the Commission was required to determine in these investigations “whether the injurious effect of imports of the subject merchandise is eliminated completely by the agreement.” Unlike in sections 701(a) and 731(a) investigations, the Commission has not analyzed here whether the subject imports from Mexico have caused material injury to a domestic industry.
Commerce is currently considering requests filed by Imperial and AmCane to continue the underlying investigations. Whether or not underlying investigative proceedings are continued will depend upon whether Commerce accepts these requests.
If the underlying investigations are not continued or if they are continued and Commerce and the Commission make affirmative final determinations in the continued investigations, the suspension agreements will remain effective. If Commerce or the Commission make a negative determination in either of the continued investigations, the pertinent suspension agreement will have no effect, and no duties will be imposed.
The Commission’s public report Sugar from Mexico (Investigation Nos. 704-TA-1 and 734-TA-1 (Review), USITC Publication 4523, April 2015) will contain the views of the Commission and information developed during the reviews.
The report will be available after April 24, 2015. After that date, it may be accessed on the USITC website at: http://pubapps.usitc.gov/applications/publogs/qry_publication_loglist.asp.
Bulletin 15-007
Inv. No(s). 701-TA-528-529 and 731-TA-1264-1268 (Preliminary)
Contact: Peg O'Laughlin, 202-205-1819
BULLETIN
The U.S. International Trade Commission has made affirmative determinations in its preliminary phase antidumping and countervailing duty investigations concerning Certain Uncoated Paper from Australia, Brazil, China, Indonesia, and Portugal.
Note to Users: This bulletin will be replaced by the news release when the release is available. News releases are generally issued approximately three hours after a Commission vote.
News Release 15-012
Inv. No(s). 701-TA-458 and 731-TA-1154 (Review)
Contact: Peg O'Laughlin, 202-205-1819
The U.S. International Trade Commission (USITC) today determined that revoking the existing antidumping and countervailing duty orders on certain kitchen appliance shelving and racks from China would be likely to lead to continuation or recurrence of material injury within a reasonably foreseeable time.
As a result of the Commission’s affirmative determinations, the existing orders on imports of these products from China will remain in place.
All six Commissioners voted in the affirmative.
Today’s action comes under the five-year (sunset) review process required by the Uruguay Round Agreements Act. See the attached page for background on these five-year (sunset) reviews.
The Commission’s public report Certain Kitchen Appliance Shelving and Racks from China (Inv. Nos. 701-TA-458 and 731-TA-1154 (Review), USITC Publication 4520, February 2015) will contain the views of the Commission and information developed during the reviews.
The report will be available after March 17, 2015. After that date, it may be accessed on the USITC website at: http://pubapps.usitc.gov/applications/publogs/qry_publication_loglist.asp.
BACKGROUND
The Uruguay Round Agreements Act requires the Department of Commerce to revoke an antidumping or countervailing duty order, or terminate a suspension agreement, after five years unless the Department of Commerce and the USITC determine that revoking the order or terminating the suspension agreement would be likely to lead to continuation or recurrence of dumping or subsidies (Commerce) and of material injury (USITC) within a reasonably foreseeable time.
The Commission’s institution notice in five-year reviews requests that interested parties file responses with the Commission concerning the likely effects of revoking the order under review as well as other information. Generally within 95 days from institution, the Commission will determine whether the responses it has received reflect an adequate or inadequate level of interest in a full review. If responses to the USITC’s notice of institution are adequate, or if other circumstances warrant a full review, the Commission conducts a full review, which includes a public hearing and issuance of questionnaires.
The Commission generally does not hold a hearing or conduct further investigative activities in expedited reviews. Commissioners base their injury determination in expedited reviews on the facts available, including the Commission’s prior injury and review determinations, responses received to its notice of institution, data collected by staff in connection with the review, and information provided by the Department of Commerce.
The five-year (sunset) reviews concerning Certain Kitchen Appliance Shelving and Racks from China were instituted on August 1, 2014.
On November 4, 2014, the Commission voted to conduct expedited reviews. All six Commissioners concluded that the domestic group response for these reviews was adequate and the respondent group response was inadequate and voted for expedited reviews.
A record of the Commission’s vote to conduct expedited reviews is available from the Office of the Secretary, U.S. International Trade Commission, 500 E Street SW, Washington, DC 20436. Requests may be made by telephone by calling 202-205-1802.
Inv. No(s). 704-TA-1 and 734-TA-1 (Review)
On January 21, 2015, the Commission issued a Notice of Institution (“Notice”) in the referenced reviews. 80 Fed. Reg. 3977 (Jan. 26, 2015). The Notice stated that the Commission would convene a proceeding on Thursday, February 19, 2015 at 9:30 a.m. at 500 E Street, SW, Washington, D.C. to receive oral presentations in these reviews. It also stated that the Commission would provide further information about the nature of that proceeding at a later date. This notice provides that information.
As an initial matter, these reviews are being conducted pursuant to sections 704(h) and 734(h) of the Tariff Act of 1930 (“the Act”) (19 U.S.C. §§ 1671c(h) and 1673c(h)). Because the focus of these reviews concerns whether the injurious effect of imports of the subject merchandise is eliminated completely by the suspension agreements at issue, presentations at the oral proceeding should focus on this inquiry. This inquiry is distinct from the analysis in the underlying antidumping and countervailing duty investigations.
Those desiring to participate at the oral proceeding should file an intent to participate in writing with the Secretary to the Commission no later than February 13, 2015 and should identify in that submission the names of the individuals who plan to participate at the proceeding. There will be two panels at the oral presentation: (1) parties in favor of the petitions filed under 704(h) and 734(h) of the Act and (2) parties opposed to these petitions. If any United States agency or agencies wish to participate, a third panel will be added consisting of these witnesses. Each panel will be allowed up to thirty minutes for its oral presentations of which it may reserve up to five minutes for rebuttal. Commissioners will ask questions of each panel after its presentation. Each participant shall limit its presentation to a summary of the information and arguments contained in the first written submissions, an analysis of the information and arguments contained in the first written submissions, and information appropriate to respond to information and arguments made in other parties’ submissions. Parties are not to otherwise present new factual information at the oral presentation but may have witnesses available to provide factual information in response to questions posed by the Commission. Presentations shall not include business proprietary information.
As indicated in the Notice, the record of these reviews will include the record from the Commission’s preliminary determinations concerning Sugar from Mexico. The Commission does not intend to place into the record information that it has collected in its final phase investigations because that information gathering process is not complete. As indicated in the Notice, parties may submit new factual information in the first written submission. Written submissions and testimony should not include any information submitted in the final phase investigations that a party has received pursuant to Administrative Protective Order or cite to any information from the record of the final phase investigations.
By order of the Commission.
Lisa R. Barton
Secretary to the Commission
Issued: February 4, 2015
News Release 14-080
Inv. No(s). 701-TA-498 and 731-TA-1213 (Final)
Contact: Peg O'Laughlin, 202-205-1819
The United States International Trade Commission (USITC) today determined that a U.S. industry is neither materially injured nor threatened with material injury by reason of imports of certain steel threaded rod from India that the U.S. Department of Commerce has determined are subsidized and sold in the United States at less than fair value.
Chairman Meredith M. Broadbent, Vice Chairman Dean A. Pinkert, and Commissioners Irving A. Williamson, David S. Johanson, and F. Scott Kieff voted in the negative. Commissioner Rhonda K. Schmidtlein did not participate in these investigations.
As a result of the USITC's negative determinations, no antidumping and countervailing duty orders will be issued.
The Commission's public report Certain Steel Threaded Rod from India (Investigation Nos. 701- TA-498 and 731-TA-1213 (Final), USITC Publication 4487, August 2014) will contain the views of the Commissioners and information developed during the investigations.
The report will be available after September 8, 2014. After that date, it may be accessed on the USITC website at: http://pubapps.usitc.gov/applications/publogs/qry_publication_loglist.asp.
Office of Industries
Washington, DC 20436
FACTUAL HIGHLIGHTS
Certain Steel Threaded Rod from India
Investigation Nos. 701-TA-498 and 731-TA-1213 (Final)
Product Description: Certain steel threaded rod is carbon quality steel rod threaded along greater than 25 percent of its length, with a solid, circular cross section, of any diameter, in any straight length, and is forged, turned, cold-drawn, cold-rolled, machine straightened, or otherwise cold-finished. This product is primarily used in commercial construction applications to suspend support systems for electrical conduit, pipes for plumbing, HVAC ductwork, sprinkler systems, etc. Normally, one end of the threaded rod is fastened to the ceiling and the other end is fastened to the support that is holding the pipes or ductwork or sprinkler.
Status of Proceedings:
1. Type of investigation: Final countervailing duty and antidumping.
2. Petitioners: All America Threaded Products, Inc., Denver, CO; Bay Standard
Manufacturing, Inc., Brentwood, CA; and Vulcan Threaded Products, Inc., Pelham,
AL.
3. Investigation instituted by USITC: June 27, 2013.
4. USITC hearing: March 20, 2014.
5. USITC vote: August 6, 2014.
6. USITC notification of Department of Commerce: August 18, 2014.
U.S. Industry:
1. Number of U.S. producers in 2013: 5.
2. Location of producers' plants: Alabama, California, Colorado, Indiana, Ohio,
Pennsylvania, and Texas.
3. Employment of production and related workers in 2013: (1)
4. U.S. producers' U.S. shipments in 2013: (1)
5. Apparent U.S. consumption in 2013: (1)
6. Ratio of subject imports to apparent U.S. consumption in 2013: (1)
U.S. Imports in 2013:
1. From the subject countries during 2013: India $14.2 million, Thailand $10.5 million.
2. From other countries during 2013: $29.6 million.
3. Leading sources during 2013: China, India, and Thailand (in terms of total value).
(1) Withheld to avoid disclosure of business proprietary information.
News Release 14-086
Inv. No(s). 731-TA-1225 (Final)
Contact: Peg O'Laughlin, 202-205-1819
The United States International Trade Commission (USITC) today determined that a U.S. industry is neither materially injured nor threatened with material injury by reason of imports of ferrosilicon from Venezuela that the U.S. Department of Commerce has determined are sold in the United States at less than fair value.
All six Commissioners voted in the negative.
As a result of the USITC's negative determination, no antidumping duty order will be issued.
The Commission's public report Ferrosilicon from Venezuela (Investigation No. 731-TA-1225 (Final), USITC Publication 4490, September 2014) will contain the views of the Commissioners and information developed during the investigation.
The report will be available after September 30, 2014. After that date, it may be accessed on the USITC website at: http://pubapps.usitc.gov/applications/publogs/qry_publication_log list.asp.
Office of Industries
Washington, DC 20436
FACTUAL HIGHLIGHTS
Ferrosilicon from Venezuela
Investigation No. 731-TA-1225 (Final)
Product Description: The merchandise covered by these investigations is all forms and sizes of ferrosilicon, regardless of grade, including ferrosilicon briquettes. Ferrosilicon is a ferroalloy containing by weight 4 percent or more iron, more than 8 percent but not more than 96 percent silicon, 3 percent or less phosphorus, 30 percent or less manganese, less than 3 percent magnesium, and 10 percent or less any other element. The merchandise covered also includes product described as slag, if the product meets these specifications.
Status of Proceedings:
1. Type of investigations: Final antidumping.
2. Petitioners: Globe Specialty Metals, Inc., New York, NY; CC
Metals and Alloys, LLC, Calvert City, KY; the United
Steel, Paper and Forestry, Rubber, Manufacturing, Energy,
Allied Industrial and Service Workers International Union
(USW); and the International Union, United Automobile,
Aerospace and Agricultural Implement Workers of America
(UAW).
3. Preliminary investigation instituted by the USITC: July 19, 2013.
4. USITC hearing: July 29, 2014.
5. USITC vote: August 26, 2014.
6. USITC determinations due: September 8, 2014.
7. Scheduled date for USITC views: September 8, 2014.
U.S. Industry:
1. Number of producers in 2013: Two.
2. Location of producers' plants: Alabama, Kentucky, and Ohio.
3. Employment of production and related workers in 2013: (1)
4. Apparent U.S. consumption in 2013: (1)
5. Ratio of the value of total U.S. imports to total U.S. consumption in 2013: (1)
U.S. Imports:
1. From the subject country during 2013: $44.8 million.
2. From other countries during 2013: $270.0 million.
3. Principal sources during 2013, by value: Russia, China, Venezuela, Canada.
(1) Withheld to avoid disclosure of business proprietary information.
News Release 14-089
Inv. No(s). 731-TA-1233, 1234, and 1236 (Final)
Contact: Peg O'Laughlin, 202-205-1819
The United States International Trade Commission (USITC) today determined that a U.S. industry is neither materially injured nor threatened with material injury by reason of imports of grain-oriented electrical steel from Germany, Japan, and Poland that the U.S. Department of Commerce has determined are sold in the United States at less than fair value.
Chairman Meredith M. Broadbent, Vice Chairman Dean A. Pinkert, and Commissioners Irving A. Williamson, David S. Johanson, and F. Scott Kieff voted in the negative. Commissioner Rhonda K. Schmidtlein voted in the affirmative.
As a result of the USITC's negative determinations, no antidumping duty orders will be issued on imports of this product from Germany, Japan, and Poland.
The Commission's public report Grain-Oriented Electrical Steel from Germany, Japan, and Poland (Investigation Nos. 731-TA-1233, 1234, and 1236 (Final), USITC Publication 4491, September 2014) will contain the views of the Commissioners and information developed during the investigations.
The report will be available after October 1, 2014. After that date, it may be accessed on the USITC website at: http://pubapps.usitc.gov/applications/publogs/qry_publication_loglist.asp.
Office of Industries
Washington, DC 20436
FACTUAL HIGHLIGHTS
Grain-Oriented Electrical Steel from
China, the Czech Republic, Germany, Japan, Korea, Poland, and Russia
Investigation Nos. 701-TA-505 and 731-TA-1231-1237 (Final)
Product Description: Grain-oriented silicon electrical steel (GOES) is a flat-rolled alloy steel product, with the metallic grains elongated lengthwise along the direction of rolling, of conventional or high magnetic permeability, and is available in either coils or straight lengths. GOES undergoes cutting, punching, coating, and other operations to manufacture laminated electro-magnetic cores for electrical power and distribution transformers. Specifically excluded are flat-rolled products not in coils that, prior to importation into the United States, have been cut to shape and undergone all punching, coating, or other operations necessary for classification as a transformer part (i.e., a laminated core).
Status of Proceedings:
1. Type of investigation: Final countervailing duty and antidumping.
2. Petitioners: AK Steel Corp., West Chester, OH; Allegheny Ludlum LLC, Pittsburgh, PA;
and the United Steel Workers, Pittsburgh, PA.
3. Investigation instituted by USITC: September 18, 2013.
4. USITC hearing: July 24, 2014.
5. USITC vote: August 27, 2014 (Germany, Japan, and Poland).
6. USITC notification of Department of Commerce: September 8, 2014.
U.S. Industry:
1. Number of U.S. producers in 2013: Two.
2. Location of producers' plants: Ohio and Pennsylvania.
3. Employment of production and related workers in 2013: (1)
4. U.S. producers' U.S. shipments in 2013: (1)
5. Apparent U.S. consumption in 2013: (1)
6. Ratio of subject imports to apparent U.S. consumption in 2013: (1)
U.S. Imports in 2013:
1. From Germany, Japan, and Poland during 2013: $48.1 million.
2. From China, the Czech Republic, Korea, and Russia during 2013: $23.3 million.
3. From other countries during 2013: $6.7 million.
4. Leading sources during 2013: Japan, the Czech Republic, and China (in terms of total
value).
(1) Withheld to avoid disclosure of business proprietary information.